Pages

Monday, October 28, 2013

Sexual Gatekeepers (a thesis teaser)

Oh boy! A thesis teaser!
Here is a rough draft of a paragraph from my thesis. This paragraph will most likely change (drastically) for obvious reasons, but it's too good not to share.
Enjoy!

One of the central metaphors in the discussion of female sexuality and purity is that of the sexual gatekeeper. In this illustration of abstinence, young women are the gatekeepers of their virginity. In order to protect their virginity from lustful, ravenous men, women are to dress and behave modestly. They must monitor their behavior to ensure that they do not excite the lust of men and therefore endanger the sacred virginity. In this metaphor, women are detached from their sexuality. Part of staying pure is to not engage with ideas of sexuality outside of matrimony. Within this metaphor, when women do not properly guard their flower they are then blamed. There is also the implication that the gate to the pleasurable garden of her vagina cannot be locked again until she recommits herself to a life of second virginity. However, the narrative of second virginity typically relies upon a sexual trauma or violence occurring before the young women recommits herself to life a purity. An implication of that narrative in conjunction with the gatekeeper metaphor is that once the gate to sex is opened it cannot be closed without revirginization. As such, a young woman might as well create some nice walking paths and start charging for entrance because she is now a whore. 

Thursday, October 24, 2013

The Case for Not Having Male Friends

The last time I had multiple male friends I was five. And then I went to elementary school where I was immediately informed of the dangers of cooties. I never went back. The majority of my friends have been non-male identified ever since. There’s always been the occasional one guy friend, but that was not the norm.
Throughout high school and even into college there felt like there was a pressure to have a better gender balance (assuming that we live in a gender binary *vomit*) in my friend group. Like there is something wrong with associating almost exclusively with non-male identified people.
So here is my case for not having male-identified friends as a female-identified person.

1. It is mother fucking exhausting.
I’m not saying that all men are misogynists or sexist. I am saying that a good number of men are pretty blind to their male privilege and how it affects people who are not men. It’s tiring to call them out. It’s draining to be in the presence of all that privilege especially when we already live in a patriarchal world.

2. I hate explaining my experiences.
Like really hate it. Especially if someone then decides to argue with me about my experience. Here is some sample dialogue:
            Me: Ugh, this guy in class was totally mansplaining at me earlier about…
Man: Are you sure he was mansplaining? I think you’re taking this gender thing too far. Just because a man explains something doesn’t make it ‘mansplaining’
Me: *face palm*
The great thing about hanging out with women is that (most of the time) they understand my experiences and have had similar ones (at least when it comes to gender, that is definitely not true for other intersections of identity).

3. I really hate censoring myself.
Things I like to talk about include: vaginas, cramps, sexism, birth control, sex, my thesis, swear words,  etc. I also talk about these things from a very (and I mean very) female perspective. Because I hate explaining my experiences, I'd rather just avoid talking about certain things. It's shitty and I hate it. Also, when it comes to IUDs and how much I like the word “cunt,” I give very little fucks about a male POV. Mostly because I get the male POV about every fucking thing every fucking day because patriarchy. Sometimes, I just want to bask in the world according to women. And by sometimes I mean like 98% of the time.

4. Explaining my sexuality is also fucking exhausting, especially to men.
“What’s pan? Does that mean you have sex with everyone?” or my favorite response: “If you like girls too, does that mean we can have a threesome?” or this “But you’re straight for me, right?” Ok, so the last two are from men I’ve fucked, but it’s the same idea. Again this doesn’t apply to all men, but les-be-honest, a lot of straight men just don’t get the different flavors of sexual orientation. And when they try to they look at it in a very self-centered fashion. If she identifies as this, what does that mean for me? You know what bro, the entire fucking world does not revolve around you.
Also, if you, reader, are now like “But wait! If you have all these problems with male-identified people why do you still have sex with them?”
My response to that is: go read a fucking book. Maybe one that has to do with pansexuality. I’ll be the first to admit that I don’t always pick winners, so I have fucked my share of sexist assholes. But sometimes sexist assholes are pretty so…

5. I’m no one’s mother.
I can’t be the only woman who has had this problem where men you are close to are suddenly looking to you to take care of them. You’re a girl and you’re my friend so that means you’ll take care of me like my mom, right? No. No, it doesn’t. Fuck you.
Also, Taylor from my high school art class, just because I’m friendly to you and can knit does not mean I will knit you mother fucking slippers. Go to Target you lazy ass.


 There are probably more, but these are the ones that I can think of right now. 

Saturday, October 12, 2013

To People Against Booty Shorts, From Me

For context, here is what I am responding to: http://www.abstinence.net/our-blog/guest-commentary/to-young-women-from-a-young-man/

Yes, that is a link to an abstinence website. Yes, I am intentionally trying to piss myself off...obvi. #thesisprobs

Everyone that has a problem with "immodesty", are you really concerned about my ability to attract a man? I have this feeling that you aren't. Like, deep down, I really don't think that it's any of your business who I "attract." What if I don't want to "attract" a "man"? Here's some advice: look at your life, look at your choices. The fact that most of you feel the need to tell women* how to dress is absurd. Especially since my v-neck makes me slutty (there's a country song for you) therefore I shouldn't show cleavage. I'm pretty sure my v-neck doesn't "make" me anything since it is an inanimate object. I think you're obsession with my v-neck makes you construct an image of me in your head as slutty. That's right. My v-neck doesn't make me slutty, you make me slutty. Thanks for that. While we are on the topic of my "sluttiness" (I prefer sexual resume or experience, but I digress), what I do with my vagina (or mouth or hands or whatever the fuck I want) doesn't make me slutty. Again, that is a you problem. So stop making it a me problem. Or a woman problem. Let's face it, you are the one that wants me to a) want a (hetero) relationship, b) not have sex outside of marriage (too late bro, and don't get me started on second virginity), c) look like a fucking virginal princess (that sounds uncomfortable and I look horrible in a crew neck), and d) shut the fuck up (I'm going out on a limb here, but I'm pretty sure that's right). You should really let go of all these expectations on me and other female-identified people. If there are some vagina havers out there that are totally down with your ideology, good for them. Just don't try to get all the vagina havers to act a certain way. It's sexist. Love you!

*I struggled to decide how to identify "women" in this piece since modesty campaigns are constructed in a gender binary. So, I switched between using "women," "female-identified," and "vagina havers." The last one is slightly tongue-in-cheek and also anatomically accurate to describe the people that modesty campaigns target as being "too slutty." If you think/feel/believe/have evidence that any of these terms is problematic, please let me know through the comments. I'm not an expert and appreciate the learning moment.